Login  Register

probably deferring action on http://n2.nabble.com/-f1804488.html archive of discuss@ux.openoffice.org

Posted by Graham Perrin on Jan 02, 2009; 8:41pm
URL: https://support.nabble.com/PEBKAM-Nabble-SMTP-address-subscribed-by-ezmlm-to-discuss-ux-openoffice-org-but-Nabble-forum-does-not-tp2017351p2103199.html

Graham Perrin wrote
Should we suspect an issue with the OOo list server?
For reference only, I quote below some detail of symptoms of problems within the openoffice.org domain and beyond.

As the problems within the openoffice.org domain seem to date from 29th December, there remains the possibility/likelihood that some *other* factor affects my problems with Nabble archiving of the list (which should have commenced on 25th December).

In any case:

* it may be wise to defer Nabble action on this topic until after I receive a response concerning the OOo list service.

Regards
Graham

From: Graham Perrin 
Date: 2 January 2009 12:58:03 GMT

Subject: problems with openoffice.org archive of discuss@ux.openoffice.org - examples

= Specific examples =

Messages archived here:
<http://markmail.org/message/grvnxx2emyexfpgh>
<http://markmail.org/message/pksxfa4cx342tily>
are missing from the Gmane archive
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.user-experience/>
-- maybe not a problem with services hosted by openoffice.org but I thought I should draw attention.

Messages archived here:
<http://markmail.org/message/grvnxx2emyexfpgh>
<http://markmail.org/message/pksxfa4cx342tily>
<http://markmail.org/message/x5ehymrwheythat7>
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.user-experience/2711>
are missing from the openoffice.org archive
<http://ux.openoffice.org/servlets/SummarizeList?listName=discuss>.


From: Graham Perrin 
Date: 2 January 2009 16:35:02 GMT

Subject: problems with openoffice.org archive of discuss@ux.openoffice.org - since 29th December

missing from the openoffice.org archive
On closer inspection <http://ux.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?listName=discuss&by=date&from=2008-12-29&to=2009-01-31&first=1&count=149> everything more recent than 29th December is missing.