[Spam Detector] Invalid spam message with too many 'sex' words. -- FAIL

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Spam Detector] Invalid spam message with too many 'sex' words. -- FAIL

Sharpie
So, I'm trying to help out a member of the R mailing list with a programming problem and have spent an hour preparing an example to post.  However, when I go to post my message, I get the following error:

[Spam Detector] Invalid spam message with too many 'sex' words.

I believe this is because the R language includes a variable type called a SEXP-- there is no way to provide my example without using this word repeatedly.

Is the spam detector a global feature of the Nabble forums or is it controlled by the people who set up a specific forum?

For reference, the text of my post can be found at:

  http://www.evernote.com/pub/cls59/public

Direct link

  http://www.evernote.com/pub/cls59/public#v=t&n=7ca1ddc0-d81c-4609-9914-c1855faf33fd&b=8cbf2e3a-a547-4648-8a8d-991c97539439


-Charlie
Charlie Sharpsteen
Undergraduate-- Environmental Resources Engineering
Humboldt State University
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Spam Detector] Invalid spam message with too many 'sex' words. -- FAIL

Hugo <Nabble>
Thanks for the message. I've changed the spam detector rules and now you should be able to post your message. Please let me know if you still have any issues.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Spam Detector] Invalid spam message with too many 'sex' words. -- FAIL

Sharpie
Hugo <Nabble> wrote
Thanks for the message. I've changed the spam detector rules and now you should be able to post your message. Please let me know if you still have any issues.
I moved the code to a gist at GitHub and inserted links where the code chunks used to be and was able to post the message.

But thanks for the quick turnaround!

-Charlie
Charlie Sharpsteen
Undergraduate-- Environmental Resources Engineering
Humboldt State University